Certified Asshole’s Blog

Author Archive

it appears only post menopausal women tend to be Anti Male

Thank You Girls

Advertisements

They say Women were Enslaved by men 1000 years Back..

SO Persecute INNOCENT men NOW

The Male Factor

This is dedicated to all those morons who say #HangTheRapists without knowing or understanding the implications to their own self or to the future generation. These morons definitely do not know that what the rape law is, they don’t know how these crimes are proved and how criminal justice system works and they definitely did not take any lesson from Tarun Tejpal or Justice Ganguly cases. These morons have no knowledge about the serious implications of the Nirbhaya Act but still give their moronic views about hanging someone.

Recently these idiots have gone one step further to demand death penalty for the juvenile rape accused if they are found guilty. This is not only shame for India but for them too. But before we understand why this is shame, let’s look at the Nirbhaya Act for Sexual Assault that these morons never bothered to check.

First of all what these…

View original post 715 more words

SIF is primarily a Men’s Rights Organisation with some secondary objectives like
child welfare of social welfare.

Then, Why name “Save Indian Family” is used?

The name was an “accidental choice” as we did not want to use other names
synonymous with Men’s Rights like:

1) Purush Hakka.
2) Pirito Purusho Poti
3) Harassed Husbands Forum.
4) Men Cell.
5) Bibi se pitne Walon ki Sangh. (Bhaarya Baadhitula ….)

Our strategies:
================

After name is decided, we wanted to make the best out of it.

We wanted to take a Liberal Standpoint, while hiding behind a conservative
sounding name.

In any case, we knew that men are Axxholes, because of logic in their mind. Men
suffer because they use logic in stead of strategies and men hate
contradictions.

We knew: Contradictions and non-logical behaviour can make you a pain in the ass
(PITA) to the system.

So, we have a Conservative Name, with liberal ideas.

We have a Men’s Rights Organisation sitting inside a Pro-Family name.

================
These Contradictions are deliberately built.

(Of course some foolish members even today do not understand why contradictions,
deceptions and treachery are important weapons against a bloody asshole sort of
enemy called Feminism).

Why, we were liberal?

Because, feminists are liberal. We wanted to sit in same boat as feminists, so
that it is difficult for them to attack us.

In fact, we wanted to be mirror images of feminists so that they find it
difficult to attack us. We never wanted any high moral ground. What will I do
with high moral ground? Cultivate ground nuts?

If we had been conservatives, then feminists can easily attack us as they have
years of practice of attacking conservatives. Conservatives are born assholes in
any case.

See, we are not here to take any classes on morals and ethics.

We were facing terrorism and we got to screw enemy and we decided to screw in
whatever possible way, we find.

So, we mixed:
=============

Conservative Name with Liberal Thoughts.
Men’s Rights with Pro-family sounding name.

See, we do not want to be saints. We wanted to be the jerks, who can screw the
system.

Only jerks can handle bitches like feminists and terrorist states like India,
which consider people to be guilty till proven innocent.
============

We did not had the luxury like some of you recent guys, to be politically
correct. We were politically incorrect jerks and we were afraid of none.

Unlike many guys now, we were not interested in creating a good name for SIF. We
wanted SIF to be a movement of jerks, who can screw the system. Even today, that
is the main intention.

=========================================
SIF is a Men’s Rights Organisation, made up of jerks.
=========================================

In this context, SIF became famous in stead of earning a bad name.

==============
I wanted SIF to earn bad name, in stead people started praising SIF.

I was shocked.

We blasted media with all kinds of language, and media sent Cars to Swarup
Sarkar’s house to carry him to Studios for his interviews.

We were not afraid of closing of SIF. We knew, we are jerks and we can create
another organisation in no time.

======================================
Being jerks, means full freedom. Do what you want to do.

Of course, legally.
======================================

Now, if SIF got famous due to jerks inside, what can I do?
Our goal was not to get famous.

Only a bunch of jerks can create a Men’s Rights Organisation and call it “Save
Indian Family” and then get famous, while kicking ass of other famous jerks like
Indira Victor Singh, Burundi Carrot and other bitches.

If you are not a jerk, this can sound shocking to you.

However, there is no way to tackle the hypocrite f****f**cking “seal the hole”
bitches called feminists and their pimp fathers and brothers.

You can not tackle these bastards and their pimp fathers or supporters by being
a nice guy, talking logic and explaining things logically.

=============
Entire history of SaveIndianFamily is open for everyone to see.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/misusedowryact/messages/1392

From 1st Message of SaveIndianFamily Yahoogroup.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/saveindianfamily/messages/1

=============

Now, look at what a jerk called “Jurk Suraiya” is writing in Times of India.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Subverse/Why-chromosome/articleshow/4721111.c
ms

Jerks need Jerk style treatment.

If you want to live in peace:

1) Use Contradictions, where ever possible.
2) Believe that you are jerk, be comfortable with it.
3) Be a pain in the ass for the system.
4) Do not use logic.
5) Screw society legally.
6) Tell everyone to be a jerk.

If you still do not understand, ask yourself the nature of your wife and in-laws
and compare their nature with above 6 points.

If anything is achieved in SIF, it is just because of jerks in it.
The others only did time pass and took credit.

The Indian System including legal system is designed for jerks and criminals.
Only jerks and criminals have respect in this system.

I hope, its clear to you:”What is SIF?”

SIF is a Pain in the Ass (PITA) to the System.
SIF is a Men’s Rights Organisation created by jerks for other jerks.
SIF is made and run by jerks, who always think they have nothing to lose.

SIF has no noble intentions except being a “pain in the ass” to the corrupt
system, the terrorists, the extortionists and feminist bitches.

The Day SIF becomes noble like Congress party, that day we lose all the battles,
the war and live like slaves.

So, do not try to make SIF a noble movement. It was not designed to be one.

If you really want to do noble things for men, women, children, humans, then
leave SIF and join Sonia’s youth Congress and do noble things.

Best Regards
Gorky
Proud to be a Jerk from Bangalore.

Posted on: May 2, 2009

பயங்கரவாதிகளிடமிருந்து தப்பிய பிரசாந்த்
prasanth

”சினிமாவில் மீண்டும் சாதிப்பேன்” – வழக்கில் மீண்ட பிரசாந்த் உற்சாகம்
மே 02,2009, தினமலர் – சென்னை:

“வரதட்சணை கொடுமை செய்தோமென்று சட்டத்தை தங்களுக்குச் சாதகமாகவும், தவறாகவும் பயன்படுத்திக்கொள்ள நினைத்த கிரகலட்சுமியின் முயற்சிகள் முறியடிக்கப்பட்டு, இறுதியில் நீதி வென்றுள்ளது,” என நடிகர் பிரசாந்த் கூறினார்.

(டோண்டுவின் கவனத்திற்கு: இவர்மேல் எய்யப்பட்ட சட்டப் பிரிவுகள் Sec 498A IPC மற்றும் Sec 3&4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. It is also learnt that Sec 406 IPC – Criminal Breach of trust – had been added)

அவர் கூறியதாவது:

நான்கு ஆண்டு போராட்டத்திற்குப் பிறகு, எங்களது திருமணம் செல்லாது என குடும்ப நல கோர்ட் தீர்ப்பு வழங்கியுள்ளது நிம்மதி அளிக்கிறது.

திருமணம் ஆன பின், மூன்றே மாதத்தில் கிரகலட்சுமி என்னை விட்டுப் பிரிந்து சென்றார். பிறகு, வேணுபிரசாத் என்பவரை ஏற்கனவே திருமணம் செய்து, நான்கு ஆண்டு குடும்பம் நடத்தியவர் என்ற செய்தி அறிந்து அதிர்ச்சியடைந்தேன். கிரகலட்சுமியைப் பொறுத்தவரை வாழ்க்கையை விட பணம் தான் நோக்கமாக இருந்தது.

வாழ்க்கையில் எனக்கு ஏற்பட்ட நிலைமை, யாருக்கும் ஏற்பட்டுவிடக் கூடாது. கிரகலட்சுமியின் குடும்பமே சூதாட்டக் கிளப்பில் பங்கு கொள்பவர்கள். வரதட்சணை கொடுமை செய்தோமென்று, சட்டத்தை அவர்கள் தங்களுக்குச் சாதகமாகவும், தவறாகவும் பயன்படுத்திக் கொள்ள முயற்சித்தனர். இறுதியில் நீதி வென்றுவிட்டது. எங்களுக்கு எந்த பழிவாங்கும் எண்ணமும் கிடையாது.

எங்களுக்குப் பிறந்த குழந்தை தற்போது சட்டரீதியாக தாயிடம் இருக்க வேண்டும் என்பதால், எதிர்காலங்களில் மீட்பதற்கான முயற்சிகள் மேற்கொள்ளப்படும்.

குடும்ப வாழ்க்கையில், பிடிக்கவில்லையென்றால் பிரிந்துவிடுவது தான் நல்லது என்பதை தெரிந்துகொண்டேன். கோர்ட்டில் வழக்கு நிலுவையில் இருந்த காலங்களில், நான் படப்பிடிப்பில் கவனம் செலுத்த முடியாமல், மிகுந்த மன உளைச்சலுக்கு உள்ளாகியிருந்தேன். அடுத்தடுத்து இரண்டு படங்களில் நடிக்க இருப்பதால், திருமணத்தைப் பற்றி யோசிக்கவில்லை. அது காதல் திருமணமாக இருக்குமா என்று தெரியவில்லை. இனி மீண்டும் படங்களில் கவனம் செலுத்தி சாதிப்பேன். இவ்வாறு பிரசாந்த்

‘In 5 years, Indians stashed Rs 688,000 cr illegally’
‘It is like this: A theft has taken place, and you are arguing about how much has been stolen. Nobody denies the theft! Nobody denies the loot!’ S Gurumurthy, member of the BJP’s taskforce on black money in banks abroad, lashes out.

n 5 years, Indians stashed Rs 688,000 cr illegally’
April 20, 2009

S Gurumurthy, the leading chartered accountant who is also the convener of the Swadeshi Jagran Manch, is a member of the taskforce created by the Bharatiya Janata Party’s [Images] prime ministerial candidate L K Advani [Images] to bring back the black money stashed away in various banks outside India if the National Democratic Alliance is voted back to power.
The first report by the taskforce was released a few days ago. Other than Gurumurthy, those involved in the preparation of the report was former Intelligence Bureau director Ajit Kumar Doval, Dr R Vaidyanathan from the Indian Institute of Management-Bangalore, and lawyer Mahesh Jethmalani, the BJP candidate from the Mumbai [Images] North-Central constituency.

In this exclusive interview with Shobha Warrier, Gurumurthy discusses tax havens, secret bank accounts and what the taskforce’s plans are.

You are part of the taskforce created to bring black money back from secret bank accounts abroad. The BJP has made it an election issue. Were you instrumental in getting Mr Advani to take up the issue?

This is a subject I have been working on since 1986. In fact, I was even arrested because I was trying to dig into the secret accounts of the Gandhi family. I have always been talking to many politicians on this subject; I had also spoken to the BJP.

At that time, it was more ideal to work on it than anything practical. It is not that India on its own can prevent global black money being generated, because there are countries which help the generation of black money by their laws, and Switzerland [Images] is the most important of them.

These countries provide secrecy, and anybody can go and deposit money incognito. Their laws prohibit the disclosure of names. Only rarely, where you can link the money to corruption or drugs, is it possible to trace the flight of capital. For that, they have treaties with different countries, including with India. But you need to know the name of the criminal and his account number to ask for the details.

It has always been a question on the minds of the Indian people and also those keen on establishing the amount of money that has gone there, but there was no proper estimate. But this has always been a topic of debate in the minds of those who are interested in the country.

Why did the BJP decide to take it up as an issue now?

It is essentially because of the turn in the Western nations’ approach to secret banking due to the economic crisis in the West. The West began feeling the pinch of secret banking. They felt that the financial system is getting destabilised because of the generation of black money.

Black money in the West is not as much flight of capital as it is evasion of taxes. In India, it is both black money and flight of capital.

Were the recent developments in Germany [Images], with its authorities asking for the secret names, the turning point?

The Germans took the step of bribing a bank official of the LGT Bank in Liechtenstein by paying $6 million. They got a secret CD containing 1,500 names of people who have stashed away money, and nearly 500, 600 of these were Germans. They acted against them, which included the head of the German postal system.

Then they told the entire world that anyone could ask for the names and if the names of those countries’ nationals were there, they would part with it free of cost. All the countries made a request, but not India. So, Advaniji wrote a letter in April last year, but an evasive reply was given.

Three other things also happened. One, after Germany acted very powerfully, there was a big diplomatic row between Liechtenstein and Germany. Liechtenstein is a place from where secret trusts are created and monies are deposited into Switzerland. It is a principality.

Then, Germany took up the issue in the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development’s 17-nation platform (Switzerland is one of them) and asked for blacklisting and sanctions against Switzerland. France [Images] also joined Germany. This happened some time in October last year.

Switzerland did not know what to do then and they began lobbying. France and Germany then took it to the G-20 preparatory meeting. They said at the G-20 meeting on April 2 that they were asking for blacklisting of and sanctions against Switzerland and all those countries that were not cooperating.

So that was why Mr Advani wanted Prime Minister Manmohan Singh [Images] to raise the issue at the G20 meet?

At that time Advaniji felt as the PM was attending the April 2 meeting, he should take up this issue. But our people remained silent at the G-20 preparatory meet.

See what India did. We didn’t forcefully ask the Germans to give us the particulars. When Germany and France took up the matter in the OECD, we didn’t welcome it. When they took up the matter in G-20 we did not support them or join them. So, from all this arose a big question, whether the government was at all interested in working against illicit Indian monies abroad. That is why Advaniji took up the matter. As the government did not take it up, the BJP had to take it up as an electoral issue.

The Congress said Mr Advani was lying…

It is like this: A theft has taken place, and you are arguing about how much has been stolen. Nobody denies the theft! Nobody denies the loot!

How much black money from India must be there in the secret Swiss accounts?

A global study was conducted by an expert, Raymond W Baker, which we have quoted in the report. He published a book in 2005, Capitalism’s Achilles Heel: Dirty Money And How To Renew The Free Market System.

After 2001, secret money became an issue of security. So America became worried about terror funding which takes place only through secret banking channels.

His book estimated the black money to be $11.5 trillion which is increasing at the rate of $1 trillion every year, out of which $500 billion is stolen from developing countries.

Is the report one of the reasons why the BJP decided to raise the issue?

That alone would not have helped. The change in the economic situation made the Western countries try to break banking secrecy. That was the most important point. US President Obama [Images] has proposed a law to break the secrecy. Like I said earlier, you have to join forces at the global level as the battle needs to be fought at the global level. That is the reason why the BJP decided to take it up.

The GFI study only indicated the magnitude of the problem. It says between 2002 and 2006, the amount of money stashed away from India would be on an average $27 billion a year and totally about $137.5 billion which is equal to Rs 688,000 crores in just five years. So, the fact of the loot can never be disputed.

What the Congress is trying to do is to dispute the maths of the issue. The fact is, whatever be the amount, it is very big.

Why do you think the Congress is not taking up the issue?

Obviously, a large part of it must be Congressmen’s money, they have ruled the country for 50 years. Why did Sonia Gandhi [Images] not speak on this subject? She is said to be a close friend of Ottavio Quattrocchi and it has been established that he had received bribe money from Bofors through secret banking systems and tax havens. The Central Bureau of Investigation successfully traced the money and kept it frozen. He was allowed to leave India first and then take the money back.

I believe the lead family of the Congress party is a suspect in the matter of foreign money and that is why the family doesn’t want the banks’ secrecy to be unveiled.

Their friends are the only people who have been caught so far. No other Indian has been caught except the people associated with the Gandhi family in the Bofors scandal.

What are the taskforce’s plans?

First, he (Advani) wanted us to find out what the global position was. That is the first report we gave. We have said it is doable if we work on an appropriate strategy. We have to also generate a national consensus and arouse a high level of consciousness among the people about the issue.

Is that the reason why a survey was conducted in Gujarat on black money in secret bank accounts?

Yes, the BJP wants to make people to proactively think and participate in the campaign.

You are talking about huge sums of money. If at all we manage to bring it back to India, what do you say India should do with it?

Even if 25 per cent of what they are talking about comes back, India’s rating will go up because it’s our own money and not borrowed money. It can transform the economic personality of the nation.

The BJP manifesto says if the money comes back, it will be used for fundamental purposes like rural roads, schools, poverty alleviation and things like that. It will be used for social causes and not building airports.

Will the current global recession make people look at globalisation from a different perspective?

Capitalism will undergo a lot of changes because today’s capitalism is not what Adam Smith conceived or Karl Marx opposed. Today, capitalists are not the people who handle capital; it’s the professionals. It’s somebody else’s money that the professionals are handling. So, it is not capitalist’s capitalism; it’s professionals’ capitalism.

Now, a further change that has taken place is, it is not actual money, but virtual money that is being used. Imaginary money has been created by brain power and that is put to use as real power. That is the crisis today.

This kind of capitalism will be gone and the original capitalism where ‘I look after my wealth’ will come back again. That is good for the world. This other man’s money I handle which has promoted the expenditure-driven market mechanism is a product of neo-capitalism.

Banking secrecy was considered one of the virtues of capitalism. Now, they call it an evil! This is the U-turn in one year!

In one of your earlier interviews, you told rediff.com that globalisation was not sustainable.

Who is talking about globalisation today? Today, it’s just not environmentally, ecologically and culturally sustainable. I have always maintained that it was not economically sustainable, because it is contrary to the very meaning and definition of economics which is associated with frugality.

It is an executive class economics different from the economy class which brings out the difference between economics and excessiveness.

Moreover, globalisation disregards the existence of countries; they talk about a global society, global rule, global citizens, global villages, etc. It was an absolutely idealistic idiosyncrasy. That is gone.

Who is talking about the WTO? I told you long ago that the WTO will not last. If you create an artificial structure, it will not stand. People in different parts of the world have their own models of living; you cannot homogenise them, make them wear the same dress, eat the same food, or see the same cinema or have the same goals. This is what West-centric globalisation attempted, and got the first taste of it in the last four, five years.

Will people start thinking in terms of swadeshi?

People will be more conscious of their surroundings, their people, their family and their society first, and not the distant world.

The distant world is good for a visit, but not for domicile.

Photograph: Sreeram Selvaraj

Source

Save Family, Save Nation- Vote Sudhir Kumar
April 20, 2009 will be a big day for Save Indian Family movement. One more milestone has been achieved on this very day. Sudhir KumarAnand, the commando of Save Family Foundation, has taken the movement of saving indian families against legal terrorism a big step forward . His nomination for Lok Sabha election from New Delhiconsitituency, through Bharat Punarnirman Dal (BPD), the party formed by IIT/IIM pass outs, was accepted by Election Commission on this day.

However, the nomination process, was not devoid of the drama thatSIFians are used to. The very next day, April 21, 2009, Dainik Jagaran, a well know Hindi newspaper daily, published the false news of cancellation of Sudhir Kumar’s nomination. SIF got into action and one of the SIF soldier rushed to the Election Office to verify it. Everything was in order, nomination was intact. Dainik Jagaran had made a big blunder by publishing false news. Or shall we suspect foul play here?
Are our opponents watching our moves ? Are they trying to demotivate our candidate ? We may not know the truth, but the fact is, we are all set to ensure a big fight to anti-family, anti-men movement of Congress.

May 7, 2009, is the D-day, when janata of New Delhi constituency will vote for its fate. They have to decide..do they want to vote for their disaster, Congress or for their harmony i.e Sudhir Kumar Ananad? Itsthier call.

IF YOU WANT TO SAVE FAMILY, SAVE NATION. VOTE SUDHIRKUMAR TO POWER.

‘Can’t cheat as well as teach husband a lesson’

An adulterous wife cannot seek relief against her husband under the Prevention of Domestic Violence Act, a city court has ruled.

Metropolitan Magistrate Surya Malik Grover said: “To enjoy the benefits of the provision (Prevention of Domestic Violence Act), the lady must come to the court with clean hands, as she should not be guilty of adultery…”

The court said, “the Prevention of Domestic Violence Act was enacted to provide speedy and expedient remedy to protect hapless victims of pervasive acts of violence occurring within family, and not to give the woman complete immunity from getting away with any kind of misdeed.”

The case

After 18 years of marriage, Sheila had filed a case against her husband Mohit (both names changed), accusing him of persistently demanding dowry and subjecting her to mental and physical torture.

She had prayed to the court to remove her husband from their shared house in the posh Greater Kailash locality in South Delhi.

The husband, however, refuted her allegations pointing out that she had not complained about this before in their 18-year marriage.

Mohit’s lawyer Vijay Kumar Aggarwal argued that “Sheila made false complaints to cover up her extra-marital affair, and in the garb of Domestic Violence Act she wanted to take possession of the house.”

Court’s view

The court took note of the fact that in their long marriage, there was not a single police complaint or any other material on record to suggest that Sheila had suffered physical or verbal abuse at the hands of Mohit.

The court observed that trouble brewed after Sheila befriended Amit (name changed), and Mohit suspected they were having an affair.

“The suspicion of the husband is not based on a figment of imagination, as insisted by the complainant, but rather upon material proof in the form of love letters and photographs,” said the judge.

Sheila “fabricated the entire story of violence against her. Even her complaint lodged in a dowry case was cancelled, as the police did not find any substance in it,” said Mohit’s lawyer.

Sumit Saxena, Hindustan Times